Institutional Evolution of Virtual Space under the Development of Artificial Intelligence and the Metaverse
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34021/ve.2025.08.03(5)Keywords:
artificial intelligence, metaverse, virtual space, digital institutions, platform economy, institutional evolutionAbstract
The rapid development of digital technologies, artificial intelligence, and immersive virtual space has significantly transformed socio-economic interactions in the digital economy. Virtual space increasingly functions not only as technological infrastructure but also as an emerging institutional environment in which economic, social, and informational interactions are coordinated through digital platforms and algorithmic systems. Although previous studies have examined digital transformation, artificial intelligence, and virtual space, the institutional mechanisms underlying the evolution of virtual space remain insufficiently explored, particularly regarding how technological innovations contribute to the formation of digital institutions and governance mechanisms within virtual ecosystems. The aim of this study is to analyse the institutional evolution of virtual space in the context of the development of artificial intelligence and metaverse technologies. The research is based on a bibliometric analysis of scientific publications indexed in the Scopus database. Bibliometric mapping and co-occurrence analysis using VOSviewer were applied to identify key thematic clusters and research trends related to institutional aspects of virtual space, while institutional and systemic analysis was used to interpret relationships between technological innovation and institutional evolution. The results reveal the emergence of an interdisciplinary research field linking digital technologies, virtual space, and institutional economics. Bibliometric mapping highlights central research themes related to virtual reality, artificial intelligence, digital environments, and social institutions. Based on the analysis, a conceptual algorithm of institutional evolution in virtual space is proposed, illustrating the transition from technological drivers and digital platforms to algorithmic governance and the emergence of digital institutions. The findings indicate that artificial intelligence and metaverse technologies contribute to the formation of platform, algorithmic, and network institutions regulating interactions within digital ecosystems. The study is limited by the use of bibliometric data from a single database and by the conceptual nature of the proposed model, highlighting the need for further empirical research on digital institutions and virtual economic space.
Downloads
References
1. Kondratiev, N. D. (1925). Bol’shie tsikly kon”iunktury [The major economic cycles]. Voprosy kon”iunktury [Problems of Conjuncture], 1(1), 28–79.
2. Kwilinski, A., & Reznik, O. (2025). Governance of Artificial Intelligence Technologies and Systems in the EU and Ukraine: Legal Foundations and Institutional Mechanisms. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 13(3), 8–52. https://doi.org/10.23762/FSO_VOL13_NO3_1
3. Sontay, G., & Karamustafaoğlu, O. (2025). Bibliometric analysis of studies on the concept of “metaverse”. Participatory Educational Research, 12(5), 292–311. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.25.74.12.5
4. Scopus data. (2025). https://www.scopus.com/
5. Yang, C., Raskin, R., Goodchild, M., & Gahegan, M. (2010). Geospatial cyberinfrastructure: Past, present and future. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 34(4), 264–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2010.04.001
6. Johnson, D. R., & Post, D. (1996). Law and borders: The rise of law in cyberspace. Stanford Law Review, 48(5), 1367–1402. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229390
7. Barbereau, T. (2025). Three concepts for the metaverse: Between fading fashion and eternal style. First Monday, 30(3). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v30i3.13728
8. Wu, T., & Hao, F. (2024). Edu-metaverse: Concept, architecture, and applications. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(8), 4352–4379. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2198567
9. Zhukova, G., & Mordous, I. (2021). Virtual Platform of Educational Institutionalism in the Context of Social Transformations. Studia Warmińskie, 58, 219–235. https://doi.org/10.31648/sw.7066
10. VOSviewer. (2025). https://www.vosviewer.com/features/examples
11. PRISMA Guidelines. (2025). http://www.prisma-statement.org/?AspxAutoDetectCookieSupport=1
12. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press.
13. North, D. C. (1991). Institutions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.5.1.97
14. Williamson, O. E. (2000). The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(3), 595–613. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.38.3.595
15. Williamson, O. E. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. Firms, Market, Relational Contracting. The Free Press.
16. Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton University Press.
17. Kwilinski, A., Dalevska, N., & Dementyev, V. V. (2022). Metatheoretical issues of the evolution of the international political economy. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(3), Article 124. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15030124
18. Dementyev, V. V., Dalevska, N., & Kwilinski, A. (2021). Institutional determinants of structuring the world political and economic space. In Proceedings of the 37th International Business Information Management Association Conference (IBIMA) (pp. 2187–2199). International Business Information Management Association.
19. Dementyev, V., Dalevska, N., & Kwilinski, A. (2021). Innovation and information aspects of the structural organization of the world political and economic space. Virtual Economics, 4(1), 54–76. https://doi.org/10.34021/ve.2021.04.01(3)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nataliya Dalevska, and Valentyna Khobta
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
